This is a man who seems to have abandoned his conviction that Compassionate Islam can moderate Muslims, teach them about cultivating good and avoiding evil, etc, and be compassionate like his god.
Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (Isma) deputy president Aminuddin Yahaya warned today (as reported by Malay Mail Online'sMore illegitimate kids without heavier Shariah punishments) that ..... Without heavier punishments from Shariah courts to deter Muslims from vice, the country will potentially see 500,000 more illegitimate children in the decade to come. He pointed out that illegitimate births involved mainly Malay-Muslim women .....
(1) Theocratic 3 P's - prohibit, persecute & punish
 |
but Oh Allah swt, your own ulama's are ruining your Compassionate image for their own power interests ... ... and giving your religion a scary reputation when it's one of Compassion, as so evidenced in at least 2 of the 5 pillars of Islam, namely zakat and empathic (not emphatic) fasting it's doubtful your ulama's understand the word 'empathic' or its equivalent in Arabic because they, for their own power-driven lusts, are more 'emphatic' than 'empathic' |
He proposes that religious discipline including proper social-cultural behaviour can be inculcated by increased severe punishments (not teachings or counselling but punishments, the more harsh the better), so as to intimidate, threaten (bully) and punish naughty Muslims into behaving. And the example he wants to show to justify the dire need for increased syariah punishment is, as expected of an ulama, illegitimate births.
Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (Isma) deputy president Aminuddin Yahaya warned today (as reported by Malay Mail Online'sMore illegitimate kids without heavier Shariah punishments) that ..... Without heavier punishments from Shariah courts to deter Muslims from vice, the country will potentially see 500,000 more illegitimate children in the decade to come. He pointed out that illegitimate births involved mainly Malay-Muslim women .....
But aren't all children the gift of Allah swt? Hasn't it been our society's act (not Allah swt) in labelling those 'gifts of Allah swt' as illegitimate?
But you know something? He failed to explain why non Malay Muslims like the Chinese, Indians and many other non-Malay women do not have such humongous problem of illegitimate births as he attempted to paint.
These non-Malay non-Muslim women and men do NOT require increased syariah punishments nor even the current syariah punishments to control their normal sexual urges. They are not perfect but they don't have the sort of sex lusts Aminuddin Yahaya said Malays have, by evidence of said illegitimate births.
Does this mean Malay men and Malay women cannot control their sexual urges to an extent that even Islam still couldn't help them? Oh, Aminuddin Yahaya, you lack faith lah!
Does this mean Malay men and Malay women cannot control their sexual urges to an extent that even Islam still couldn't help them? Oh, Aminuddin Yahaya, you lack faith lah!
MM Online in the same news also informs us: In 2014, Kelantan deputy mentri besar Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah had told Malay Mail Online of the PAS-led state government’s plan to empower the Shariah courts to try Muslims for serious crimes ― such as premarital sex punishable by 100 lashes and adultery punishable by death.
See! PAS ulamas have only focussed on issues such as premarital sex, adultery, bonking on the back of a camel (but not kerbau), divorcees being 'gatal sikit'* and wives being deemed by the Kelantan law as abusive if they do not satisfy their hubby's sexual requirements**. Or that posters on watches, shampoos and unisex hair dressing salons are not permitted. Their ulama minds are so consumed with these sexual issues.
* a PAS politician, Abdul Fatah Harun, the ‘honourable’ (wakakaka) PAS member for Rantau Panjang, told the Dewan Rakyat in 2006 that “If we see women who don’t have husbands and are divorced not because their husbands are dead, (it must be because) they are ‘gatal sikit’”.
** in 2006 Kelantan mufti Mohamad Shukri Mohamad explained that in a marriage, it's not always the wives who were abused as it could also happen to the husbands. He advised that Islamic laws protect both women and men.
He warned: "Thus wives who do not provide proper care for their husbands, including not fulfilling their sexual needs, can be considered as being unjust and abusive towards their husbands."
"These women can be charged under Section 128 (1) of the Kelantan Islamic Law Enactment 2002, which provides for a fine of RM 1,000 or jail of up to six months or both upon conviction."
But in a manner not unusual of either important big shots (CEOs, ministers, preachers, etc) or impossible big bullshitters, he skipped the details, yup, by neglecting to elaborate on how the syariah courts would determine any husband’s claims of his wife abusive failings to satisfy his sexual needs as per, wakakaka, Section 128 (1) of the Kelantan Islamic Law Enactment 2002.
As we know, some husbands may have excessive sexual needs, so the poor wives could be required to perform to super-human standards, you know, 'above and beyond' the call of duty.
He warned: "Thus wives who do not provide proper care for their husbands, including not fulfilling their sexual needs, can be considered as being unjust and abusive towards their husbands."
"These women can be charged under Section 128 (1) of the Kelantan Islamic Law Enactment 2002, which provides for a fine of RM 1,000 or jail of up to six months or both upon conviction."
But in a manner not unusual of either important big shots (CEOs, ministers, preachers, etc) or impossible big bullshitters, he skipped the details, yup, by neglecting to elaborate on how the syariah courts would determine any husband’s claims of his wife abusive failings to satisfy his sexual needs as per, wakakaka, Section 128 (1) of the Kelantan Islamic Law Enactment 2002.
As we know, some husbands may have excessive sexual needs, so the poor wives could be required to perform to super-human standards, you know, 'above and beyond' the call of duty.
Back again to Kelantan deputy MB Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah, as reported by MM Online - He had then said PAS wanted to amend the 1965 law to enable Shariah courts to impose heavier penalties such as death penalty and amputations, as well as to seek approval to enact punishments for crimes that fall under the Penal Code.
"... to seek approval to enact punishments for crimes that fall under the Penal Code" He wants the syariah courts to take over from the civil courts.
But the existing fact that syariah courts are limited in their issued punishments while the civil courts can go up to the death penalty is stark and irrefutable evidence that the syariah courts are subordinate to civil courts, ...
... and no amount of screaming or threatening by the ulamas and their cronies can disprove the bare evidence lying in front of us. We are therefore indisputably a secular nation, regardless of what Mahathir unilaterally declared in his 929 & 617 Declarations.
But you know what, if hudud laws were to be in effect I would like to amputate those ulama's, no not their dicks or arms or legs or stupid heads, but their dirty-clouded minds, though I have to refrain from the giving them the death penalty because I am against capital punishment ...
... which brings us to the issue of Canny Ong's murderer-rapist being executed recently. I am against his execution or anyone's execution a la the biblical 'eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth' and rather he be imprisoned for life, but this discussion has to be another post.
But it goes to show how that particular Muslim was so filled with lust that he raped a stranger Canny Ong and then callously murdered her, despite his Islamic upbringing. Do you think for a moment he was the exception to the rule? Please think again, or better, investigate.
Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc are land with full implementation of syariah laws inclusive of hudud, yet there are far more illicit sex and rape incidents (including lust-&-power-driven 'honour' rapes) and incests (check whether Kelantan and Terengganu top Malaysian states for reported incests) and sodomy going on in those so-called syariah-compliant lands than in Singapore or Japan, not that they are perfect, but at least Singapore and Japan enjoy a better image or less sex-crime incidents.
I believe the real aim of increased syariah punishment including the death penalty and amputation is more to enhance the powers of the ulama's (like what's happening in ISIL controlled regions) so that those clerics can be more scary in their hudud-powers that every Muslim and eventually non-Muslims will obey them unquestioningly, yes, unquestioningly, even if those ulamas are evil, wicked and oppressive. Tell me, who in ISIL regions dares to question or challenge those IS brutal draconian dictators?
Related:
(1) Theocratic 3 P's - prohibit, persecute & punish