Malaysiakini - ‘Nasi Lemak Anak Dara’ owner unfazed by lewd calls, pictures
![]()
![]()
Hmmm, I wonder how could a vagina be appetizing but there was no/is telling of taste (ahem) when Abū al-Faḍl ‘Abd al-Raḥmān was consoled by probably only a camel in Egypt's Western desert, wakakaka.
For selling her nasi lemak under an apparently saucy label 'Nasi Lemak Anak Dara', business owner Siti Hajjar Ahmad admitted she has been harassed with lewd calls and even lewd pictures from errant males.
Since she started her business about one month ago, Siti Hajjar said she has received at least six lewd calls, including messages with lewd pictures.
Most of these 'naughty' messages and calls came around midnight, forcing the 24-year-old to turn off her phone.
"I once received sexually harassing calls, and at two in the morning I received lewd pictures. I was shocked, I blocked him, turned off my data, shut down the phone and went to sleep.
"I received weird messages at least six times from different individuals. They got my number from my Facebook posting," she told Malaysiakini.
Siti Hajjar's 'Nasi Lemak Anak Dara' stall made headlines last week when Selangor Menteri Besar Azmin Ali visited her stall to hand over forms for her to apply for a hawker's licence.
Since she started her business about one month ago, Siti Hajjar said she has received at least six lewd calls, including messages with lewd pictures.
Most of these 'naughty' messages and calls came around midnight, forcing the 24-year-old to turn off her phone.
"I once received sexually harassing calls, and at two in the morning I received lewd pictures. I was shocked, I blocked him, turned off my data, shut down the phone and went to sleep.
"I received weird messages at least six times from different individuals. They got my number from my Facebook posting," she told Malaysiakini.
Siti Hajjar's 'Nasi Lemak Anak Dara' stall made headlines last week when Selangor Menteri Besar Azmin Ali visited her stall to hand over forms for her to apply for a hawker's licence.
Sweetie of course could expect Azmin to make a call, wakakaka. But the person Siti Hajjar should probably watch out for is the man in the following photo.
It's about registration of brand all across the world. In Australia, a shop which had been operating under his own designed Virgin brand since nineteen k'ong k'ong(Penang colloquialism meaning for eons, wakakaka) found to his shock, from a legal letter sent by the global Virgin, that he was infringing rights of the globally registered brand and to cease and desist using the name within xx number of days, or he won't be one, that was, a virgin (financial one, of course, wakakaka).
He had no choice but to change his shop's name even though he came out with the Virgin brand when 'someone' was still in his diapers, wakakaka. Rave and rant and call the law an ass, but the reality life and laws regulating brand registration are tough.
But I think Siti should well be safe because her brand is in Melayu, and it's quite unlikely Anak Dara will take to the sky in the near future, wakakaka.
On the subject of anak dara, many religions seem to have a very involved stake in it. They seem to indicate some men's unceasing selfish and avaricious demand for sweeties who were 'untouched, unpossessed and unused' but for their own sexual gratifications or, in rarer case, their worship and respect (eg. Roman vestal virgins, Miryam the mum of Yehoshua ben Yosef).
Let's start off with Islam where the most well-known one is the writing of Abū al-Faḍl ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Bakr ibn Muḥammad Jalāl al-Dīn al-Khuḍayrī al-Suyūṭī (1445 - 1505) who wrote:
Let's start off with Islam where the most well-known one is the writing of Abū al-Faḍl ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Bakr ibn Muḥammad Jalāl al-Dīn al-Khuḍayrī al-Suyūṭī (1445 - 1505) who wrote:
Each time we sleep with a Houri we find her virgin.
Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint.
Each chosen one [i.e. Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetizing vaginas.
The myth of perpetual virginity, despite or rather in spite of the 'virgin' being shagged umpteen times, reminds me of Draupadi in Hindu legend.
Draupadi is the principal female personality in the Mahabharata, where the story of that Hindu epic would have been meaningless without her. Her husbands were the Pandava brothers, yes, her husbands in plural, wakakaka.
As the Mahabharata tell us, after Arjuna (No 3 of the Pandava brothers) won Draupadi's hand in an archery contest, she married all five of the Pandava brothers, due to a casual unthinking remark by their mum, Kunti.
Hindu values required her as the heroine to be a chaste virgin for each of the heroic brother, not unlike the houri of Abū al-Faḍl ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Bakr of the 'appetizing vaginas' fame.
In another Mahabharata episode, Yudhishthira the husband of Draupadi (Brother No 1 of the Pandavas) lost her in a game of dice to his enemy-cousin Duryodhana of the Kauravas. Having on her, the cousin started to unravel her saree to strip her naked as an act of insult to the Pandavas, but thanks to her divine saviour Krishna, her saree was endless (to the envy of Globe Silk Store), thus any amount of naughty unravelling was futile.
Again, Hindu values intervened to keep the chastity of a heroine.
A wee while back in time, Kunti the mum of the 5 Pandava brothers had, prior to her acts of sex with the gods Dharma, Vayu and Indra (mind you, not at the same time) and giving birth respectively to to Yudhishthira (No 1 Pandava brother), Bhima (No 2) and Arjuna (No 3), had a prior sexual liaison with the sun god Surya whereafter she gave birth to Karna.
After giving birth to Karna, her first son, Kunti miraculously reverted to being a virgin again. Hmmm.
Meanwhile the Christians made Miryam, mum of Yehoshua, into a virgin. She gave birth to Yehoshua through a process claimed as virgin birth.
But the story of virgin birth buggered the prophecy that Yehoshua as a descendant of King David, as claimed by Israelites to be a promise to David by YHWH.
In 2 Samuel 12 - 14 we read:
In another Mahabharata episode, Yudhishthira the husband of Draupadi (Brother No 1 of the Pandavas) lost her in a game of dice to his enemy-cousin Duryodhana of the Kauravas. Having on her, the cousin started to unravel her saree to strip her naked as an act of insult to the Pandavas, but thanks to her divine saviour Krishna, her saree was endless (to the envy of Globe Silk Store), thus any amount of naughty unravelling was futile.
Again, Hindu values intervened to keep the chastity of a heroine.
A wee while back in time, Kunti the mum of the 5 Pandava brothers had, prior to her acts of sex with the gods Dharma, Vayu and Indra (mind you, not at the same time) and giving birth respectively to to Yudhishthira (No 1 Pandava brother), Bhima (No 2) and Arjuna (No 3), had a prior sexual liaison with the sun god Surya whereafter she gave birth to Karna.
After giving birth to Karna, her first son, Kunti miraculously reverted to being a virgin again. Hmmm.
Meanwhile the Christians made Miryam, mum of Yehoshua, into a virgin. She gave birth to Yehoshua through a process claimed as virgin birth.
But the story of virgin birth buggered the prophecy that Yehoshua as a descendant of King David, as claimed by Israelites to be a promise to David by YHWH.
In 2 Samuel 12 - 14 we read:
"When your days are fulfilled and you rest with your fathers, I will set up your seed after you, who will come from your body and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for My name and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. For I will be his father and he will be my son"
But Matthew screwed it when wrote the genealogy of Yehoshua in his gospel. Yehoshua was an issue (son) from Yosef who was no doubt descended from King David. But if Yosef was the father, then Mariam couldn't have had a virgin birth. Matthew had recklessly started with King David via his son King Solomon which came down to Yosef, but as just mentioned, conflicted with the virgin birth. If Yosef acted like a red blooded man, there was then no virgin birth, but if Yosef couldn't or didn't perform, without him (Yosef), then where was the lineage from King David?
Fortunately for the biblical authors, Mariam was also from the House of David so a revision or different genealogy was written subsequently during Luke's time, Luke was smarter, probably seeing how Matthew f**ked it up, by starting from another of David's son, Nathan.
Unlike Yosef who was from King Solomon's line, Mariam was of Nathan's line, thus Yehoshua (Jesus) could be traced along the Nathan to Mariam line without Yosef being involved. Thus Mariam satisfied the prophecy that Yehoshua was of King David's lineage (via David's son Nathan) and also the virgin birth claim (minus Yosef the poor luckless hubby).
There was another factor, YHWH's curse on Jeconiah, why Luke's version supports Yehoshua to be King of the Israelites while Matthew's version did not. but let's leave this for another post, wakakaka.
Anak dara ... er?