Star - Dr Mahathir should reopen Altantuya case, says Mongolia's President (extracts):
![]()
PETALING JAYA: Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad should reopen the murder case of Altantuya Shariibuu, said Mongolia's President Khaltmaagiin Battulga.
“I sincerely hope that you will pay attention to bringing justice, implementing court decisions and settling the civil suit of the family of the victim in a fair manner to invigorate the atmosphere in the bilateral relations between our two countries,” Battulga said in a letter to Dr Mahathir on Wednesday (May 16).
“As the President of Mongolia, I pay special attention to the grave crime committed in Malaysia on Oct 18, 2006 - the murder of Ms Shariibuu Altantuya, a Mongolian national and a mother of two children," he added.
The SD bullshit was so obvious that only the 'converted' would believe it.
Furthermore he had two months of careful drafting of the 1st SD with Americk Singh, an immaculate lawyer.
He was thus prepared for shit to happen, what more with Anwar Ibrahim heading the news-breaking press conference, YET within one-day Bala capitulated and came out with a second SD denying his first SD.
PETALING JAYA: Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad should reopen the murder case of Altantuya Shariibuu, said Mongolia's President Khaltmaagiin Battulga.
“I sincerely hope that you will pay attention to bringing justice, implementing court decisions and settling the civil suit of the family of the victim in a fair manner to invigorate the atmosphere in the bilateral relations between our two countries,” Battulga said in a letter to Dr Mahathir on Wednesday (May 16).
“As the President of Mongolia, I pay special attention to the grave crime committed in Malaysia on Oct 18, 2006 - the murder of Ms Shariibuu Altantuya, a Mongolian national and a mother of two children," he added.
I don't blame the Mongolian President for calling for the Altantuyaa case to be re-opened, even though her murderers have already been arrested, trialled, found guilty and charged with the death penalty.
The propaganda against Najib and wife has been so effective that almost everyone, both in Malaysia and abroad, believes the couple were the murderers.
It all started as a black operation to sully Najib's name during AAB days so he (Najib) couldn't get to be DPM. But alas for his detractors he became DPM and then, thanks to Mahathir wakakaka, the PM.
During the black ops, we saw the escalation of the murder accusation bearing fruit in the SD bullshit.
During the black ops, we saw the escalation of the murder accusation bearing fruit in the SD bullshit.
The SD bullshit was so obvious that only the 'converted' would believe it.
It was not so much the contents of the SD but the one-day capitulation of Balasubramaniam, the world'"greatest" PI, in the notorious Double-SD saga.
At that time, in fact way before it, in a pub (The Backyard pub) in Sri Hartamas with some 'choice' drinking mateys, the late Bala decided to issue a SD, knew who he was accusing (the DPM of Malaysia), what he was alleging (linking the DPM of Malaysia, Najib to murdered Mongolian Altantuyaa Shaariibuu) and what could and would be the probable consequences.
 |
[left to right] Americk Singh, PI Balasubramaniam, Anwar Ibrahim, Sivarasa |
At that time, in fact way before it, in a pub (The Backyard pub) in Sri Hartamas with some 'choice' drinking mateys, the late Bala decided to issue a SD, knew who he was accusing (the DPM of Malaysia), what he was alleging (linking the DPM of Malaysia, Najib to murdered Mongolian Altantuyaa Shaariibuu) and what could and would be the probable consequences.
Furthermore he had two months of careful drafting of the 1st SD with Americk Singh, an immaculate lawyer.
He was thus prepared for shit to happen, what more with Anwar Ibrahim heading the news-breaking press conference, YET within one-day Bala capitulated and came out with a second SD denying his first SD.
Do you expect me to believe that?
His claimed visit to the police after that fateful press conference for the 1st SD, where he had accused the DPM of Malaysia of complicity in a murder, was UNACCOMPANIED by his lawyer or any of the platoon of PKR people who were there at the press conference. He went alone.
Do you expect me to believe that?
It was such a ridiculous situation that brought Brother Haris Ibrahim out to question such a disastrous overlook by the PKR people or/and his lawyer - WTF, the man who had just accused the DPM of villainous 'relationship' with a murdered Mongolian model, and was allowed to report to (at that time) the MOST dangerous place in Malaysia all ALONE by himself???
But wait, it seemed Bala DID not report to the police station afterall.
Subsequent revelation informed us Bala, instead of reporting to the police station as we were originally informed, went instead to Rawang with one ASP Suresh (who BTW could have been the ASP Suresh who was also with Bala drinking in The Backyard pub in Sri Hartamas two months earlier) to meet one Deepak where he was offered RM5 million by the latter to withdraw his 1st SD.
So here’s a man who confessed he was so scared of the police lockup that he, under duress, signed a police statement on the Altantuyaa’s murder with no mention of Najib Razak at all (we must be sympathetic with his concerns as afterall he’s a dad with 3 kids to feed and look after), …
… BUT who subsequently decided to be another courageous RPK and make a SD of earth-shaking proportion against the man who was going to be (then) the next most powerful political leader of Malaysia …
… and then there he was, in Rawang with ASP Suresh burning some copper wires …
Huh?
… and presumably as he would have us believed him, he was again under duress (AGAIN for fear of his family's safety, this time under mafioso threat) and thus withdrew his 1st SD by way of a 2nd SD. BTW, did I mention the RM5 million somewhere?
It’s just too full of contradictions (from being fearful to utterly courageous back to being fearful; going to police station without a lawyer as if he didn’t know what a police station in Malaysia for a man who just made a damning SD against the DPM means but ending up in Rawang etc etc etc?).
What would be more plausible?
We need to ask ourselves three questions:
(1) Who would be damaged by the SD?
(2) Which SD (1st or 2nd) would be the far more damaging?
If you ask kaytee, I'd say the 1st SD was accusative against Najib, whilst the 2nd SD damned Najib forevermore. If I want to get Najib kaukau, I would have ensured a Double-SD situation - namely, accused him then damned him so he could not get up again.
(3) What’s in it for Balasubramaniam – in other words what scenario would best benefit a father of 3 kids, fearful of the police lockup and for his family, to motivate him to make such a damning report against a powerful man?
Would it be a pre-planned package of 2 prepared SDs, the 2nd to be released after the inevitable visit to the police station but PLEASE without a lawyer (“No, Mr Americk Singh, I don’t need you, it’s OK, just a fish head curry with an old buddy”)?
And YES he did retract the 1st SD which meant he could have been paid … but by whom???
Quite frankly, for a man who claimed he was driven out of Malaysia by Najib, we heard MKINI reporting that Balasubramaniam rang them up a number of times to claim he was back in Malaysia a few times to sort out family matters.
It's worth looking in the genesis of the SD plot which started in The Backyard pub in Sri Hartamas, and who were the people there apart from the late Balasubramaniam.
But what motive did the two sweet innocent policemen have? [Instructed by a "someone" above?]
What alleged motives did policemen have for the deaths of hundreds of people who perished in police custody? [Instructed by a "someone" above?]
Well, what motive did the murderer of Canny Ong have? [Instructed by a "someone" above?]
For an answer to Canny Ong's murder, read my post The Altantuyaa Stat Dec (2).
But the point today is that the whole of Malaysia and indeed the world especially Mongolia won't be happy UNTIL Najib and wife are hung by their necks until they are dead, all based NOT on evidence of Najib being with Altantuyaa and such likes, but ONLY on the words of one single person, Balasubramaniam, who BTW had never seen Najib with Altantuyaa.
And fCK whether Naiib and wife have been guilty or not - that's besides the point.
Razak Baginda better bloody stay out and not inconvenience the already formed and framed picture of the guilty couple.
Related:
(1) Will 'neutrality' of Mr 'Neutral' be neutralised?. [posted 03 Dec 2012]
Do you expect me to believe that?
It was such a ridiculous situation that brought Brother Haris Ibrahim out to question such a disastrous overlook by the PKR people or/and his lawyer - WTF, the man who had just accused the DPM of villainous 'relationship' with a murdered Mongolian model, and was allowed to report to (at that time) the MOST dangerous place in Malaysia all ALONE by himself???
But wait, it seemed Bala DID not report to the police station afterall.
Subsequent revelation informed us Bala, instead of reporting to the police station as we were originally informed, went instead to Rawang with one ASP Suresh (who BTW could have been the ASP Suresh who was also with Bala drinking in The Backyard pub in Sri Hartamas two months earlier) to meet one Deepak where he was offered RM5 million by the latter to withdraw his 1st SD.
So here’s a man who confessed he was so scared of the police lockup that he, under duress, signed a police statement on the Altantuyaa’s murder with no mention of Najib Razak at all (we must be sympathetic with his concerns as afterall he’s a dad with 3 kids to feed and look after), …
… BUT who subsequently decided to be another courageous RPK and make a SD of earth-shaking proportion against the man who was going to be (then) the next most powerful political leader of Malaysia …
… and then there he was, in Rawang with ASP Suresh burning some copper wires …
Huh?
… and presumably as he would have us believed him, he was again under duress (AGAIN for fear of his family's safety, this time under mafioso threat) and thus withdrew his 1st SD by way of a 2nd SD. BTW, did I mention the RM5 million somewhere?
It’s just too full of contradictions (from being fearful to utterly courageous back to being fearful; going to police station without a lawyer as if he didn’t know what a police station in Malaysia for a man who just made a damning SD against the DPM means but ending up in Rawang etc etc etc?).
What would be more plausible?
We need to ask ourselves three questions:
(1) Who would be damaged by the SD?
(2) Which SD (1st or 2nd) would be the far more damaging?
If you ask kaytee, I'd say the 1st SD was accusative against Najib, whilst the 2nd SD damned Najib forevermore. If I want to get Najib kaukau, I would have ensured a Double-SD situation - namely, accused him then damned him so he could not get up again.
(3) What’s in it for Balasubramaniam – in other words what scenario would best benefit a father of 3 kids, fearful of the police lockup and for his family, to motivate him to make such a damning report against a powerful man?
Would it be a pre-planned package of 2 prepared SDs, the 2nd to be released after the inevitable visit to the police station but PLEASE without a lawyer (“No, Mr Americk Singh, I don’t need you, it’s OK, just a fish head curry with an old buddy”)?
And YES he did retract the 1st SD which meant he could have been paid … but by whom???
Quite frankly, for a man who claimed he was driven out of Malaysia by Najib, we heard MKINI reporting that Balasubramaniam rang them up a number of times to claim he was back in Malaysia a few times to sort out family matters.
It's worth looking in the genesis of the SD plot which started in The Backyard pub in Sri Hartamas, and who were the people there apart from the late Balasubramaniam.
But what motive did the two sweet innocent policemen have? [Instructed by a "someone" above?]
What alleged motives did policemen have for the deaths of hundreds of people who perished in police custody? [Instructed by a "someone" above?]
Well, what motive did the murderer of Canny Ong have? [Instructed by a "someone" above?]
 |
what motive did the murderer have for killing Canny Ong? |
But the point today is that the whole of Malaysia and indeed the world especially Mongolia won't be happy UNTIL Najib and wife are hung by their necks until they are dead, all based NOT on evidence of Najib being with Altantuyaa and such likes, but ONLY on the words of one single person, Balasubramaniam, who BTW had never seen Najib with Altantuyaa.
And fCK whether Naiib and wife have been guilty or not - that's besides the point.
Razak Baginda better bloody stay out and not inconvenience the already formed and framed picture of the guilty couple.
Related:
(1) Will 'neutrality' of Mr 'Neutral' be neutralised?. [posted 03 Dec 2012]
(2)The missing man in the Altantuyaa story. [posted 25 Feb 2013]
(2)Be careful what you ask for!. [posted 31 Jan 2015]