Wakakaka, I just love the Malaysiakini headline for its 'Vox Populi Comments', now re-titled as 'Your Say'.
It's Zahid, the face that launched a thousand slaps, wakakaka.
I thought it was a clever editor who cheekily put up that wonderful line from a Greek myth, but on reading 'Your Say' I note that it has been Malaysiakini commentator Louis who brilliantly used that line.
Louis wrote (rather delightfully): There is Helen of Troy, with the face that launched a thousand ships, and then there’s Zahid of Malaysia, with the face that launched a thousand slaps.
Wakakaka I just love it, ... and he went on to describe how Ahmad Zahid by offering his face for some well-deserved slaps could earn a few billion ringgit for charity, wakakaka again.
Now, for those of you who aren't familiar with what Louis meant by 'There is Helen of Troy, with the face that launched a thousand ships ...' he was referring to Helen of Sparta (rather than Troy as has been popularly depicted), who was the daughter of King Tyndareus of Sparta. In the very very ancient Hellenic age, she was considered to be the most beautiful woman in the world.
![]()
We have to view the claim of Helen being the most beautiful woman in the 'World' as a bit of katak dibawah tempurung expression, not unlike the Americans calling their baseball league games the World Series, wakakaka.
Anyway, back to our story of Helen of ... er ... ooops ... wakakaka ...Troy or Sparta, of course (what were you thinking, wakakaka) - it's a lovely story but like all Greek tales, is tragic with all sorts of bizarre twists, turns and tears in which would see father bonked daughter (Thyestes raped Pelopia to fulfill an oracle's pre-requisite for successful revenge), son killed dad and then married mum (Oedipus and mum Jocasta, and from that, we get the Oedipus complex), son killed mum (Orestes killed Clytemnestra for her murder of Orestes dad, Agamemnon), adopted son-nephew killed uncle (Aegisthus killing Atreus), so on so forth.
To cut the myth short, two young princes, Menelaus and his elder brother Agamemnon, dispossessed by their uncle of their father's kingdom Mycenae, went into exile and after a bit of wandering around the various kingdoms of Greece, ended up marrying the daughters of the King of Sparta. Menelaus married our famous Helen while his brother married Helen's sister Clytemnestra (again there were also generational tragedies in the latter marriage).
Wakakaka, the story of how he married Helen also involved Helen's cousin, a sweetheart by the name of Penelope wakakaka (kaytee's private joke lah, wakakaka) which was the outcome of a deal between King Tyndareus and Odysseus wakakaka (another of kaytee's private joke, wakakaka).
Okay, just let me catch a breath or two from my too-much wakakaka-ing, wakakaka.
So, though Menelaus and Helen were happily married, along came Paris (or Alexandros), Prince of Troy and a cowardly womanizer. He either seduced Helen (film makers like this version) or kidnapped her back to Troy (more the likely version because she was in love with Menelaus and happily married to him). Paris immoral action started a war that only ended with the total destruction of Troy and Trojan civilization.
I had briefly described the myth behind this myth about how Paris got Helen in my post Deceitful Durian of Discord, a Malaysianized play of words on the Greek myth about the Apple of Discord in the Trojan tragedy.
When the mighty combined Greek armada and army were about to set off from Aulis, Greece to Troy to bring back Helen (which they finally succeeded after umpteen blood-soaked and blood-stained years) it was said that the beautiful Helen was 'the face that launched a thousand ships'.
This poetic immortal line might have come from Christopher Marlowe in his play Doctor Faustus (1592), where he wrote:
Was this the face that launch'd a thousand ships
And burnt the topless towers of Ilium?
Sweet Helen, make me immortal with a kiss.
Ilium is another name for Troy.
Oh blast, I have wandered way off course in the post about slapping Ahmad Zahid wakakaka.
Let's examine just a few comments in Malaysiakini's 'Your Say':
Doc: What's the use of trying to slap some sense into Zahid? Zahid's statement that slapping DAP’s Seputeh MP Teresa Kok does not constitute a threat is not his first - nor will it be his last - idiotic statement.
We really need to identify if Zahid has a brain in between his two ears, or if it is just filled with kangkung to hold up his face.
Not Smart: Zahid, you are the only one who says that it is not a threat, but see for yourself how the public feels about the actions and words of the Muslim NGOs.
By you wanting to protect the NGOs and being selective in your actions, it looks like the slaps are now coming on to your face. The many rakyat’s same views on this matter cannot be wrong.
Even in a family, if a child says “I will slap you” to his/her siblings, the parents will intervene to stop such behaviour, to be fair and to protect the innocent.
We don't know much about your family's background and upbringing, but your actions, arrogance, and words do not reflect well of your character. Ask a child if such words from a stranger would be threatening and may be you can learn from the answer.
You are probably the worst, and the bottom of the 47 percent lot.
... and my choice of the lot, wakakaka:
It's Zahid, the face that launched a thousand slaps, wakakaka.
 |
| Wow, in military uniform but has he ever served a single day as a police or military personnel? And where was this pseudo-pahlawan when Chinese & Indian military/police personnel sacrificed their blood, toil, tears & sweat, and not forgetting lives for the nation? |
I thought it was a clever editor who cheekily put up that wonderful line from a Greek myth, but on reading 'Your Say' I note that it has been Malaysiakini commentator Louis who brilliantly used that line.
Louis wrote (rather delightfully): There is Helen of Troy, with the face that launched a thousand ships, and then there’s Zahid of Malaysia, with the face that launched a thousand slaps.
Wakakaka I just love it, ... and he went on to describe how Ahmad Zahid by offering his face for some well-deserved slaps could earn a few billion ringgit for charity, wakakaka again.
Now, for those of you who aren't familiar with what Louis meant by 'There is Helen of Troy, with the face that launched a thousand ships ...' he was referring to Helen of Sparta (rather than Troy as has been popularly depicted), who was the daughter of King Tyndareus of Sparta. In the very very ancient Hellenic age, she was considered to be the most beautiful woman in the world.
We have to view the claim of Helen being the most beautiful woman in the 'World' as a bit of katak dibawah tempurung expression, not unlike the Americans calling their baseball league games the World Series, wakakaka.
Anyway, back to our story of Helen of ... er ... ooops ... wakakaka ...Troy or Sparta, of course (what were you thinking, wakakaka) - it's a lovely story but like all Greek tales, is tragic with all sorts of bizarre twists, turns and tears in which would see father bonked daughter (Thyestes raped Pelopia to fulfill an oracle's pre-requisite for successful revenge), son killed dad and then married mum (Oedipus and mum Jocasta, and from that, we get the Oedipus complex), son killed mum (Orestes killed Clytemnestra for her murder of Orestes dad, Agamemnon), adopted son-nephew killed uncle (Aegisthus killing Atreus), so on so forth.
 |
| scholars have had problems with the etymology of the name 'Helen' with some believing it to be of Indo-European origin which then links it to the Hindu Goddess of Clouds Saranyu who like Helen of Troy was also abducted, as sang in the Vedic-Sanskrit Rigveda Tvastar prepares the bridal of his Daughter: all the world hears the tidings and assembles. But Yama's Mother, Spouse of great Vivasvat, vanished as she was carried to her dwelling. From mortal men they hid the Immortal Lady, made one like her and gave her to Vivasvat. Saranyu brought to him the Asvin brothers, and then deserted both twinned pairs of children |
To cut the myth short, two young princes, Menelaus and his elder brother Agamemnon, dispossessed by their uncle of their father's kingdom Mycenae, went into exile and after a bit of wandering around the various kingdoms of Greece, ended up marrying the daughters of the King of Sparta. Menelaus married our famous Helen while his brother married Helen's sister Clytemnestra (again there were also generational tragedies in the latter marriage).
Wakakaka, the story of how he married Helen also involved Helen's cousin, a sweetheart by the name of Penelope wakakaka (kaytee's private joke lah, wakakaka) which was the outcome of a deal between King Tyndareus and Odysseus wakakaka (another of kaytee's private joke, wakakaka).
Okay, just let me catch a breath or two from my too-much wakakaka-ing, wakakaka.
So, though Menelaus and Helen were happily married, along came Paris (or Alexandros), Prince of Troy and a cowardly womanizer. He either seduced Helen (film makers like this version) or kidnapped her back to Troy (more the likely version because she was in love with Menelaus and happily married to him). Paris immoral action started a war that only ended with the total destruction of Troy and Trojan civilization.
 |
| Helen and Paris |
I had briefly described the myth behind this myth about how Paris got Helen in my post Deceitful Durian of Discord, a Malaysianized play of words on the Greek myth about the Apple of Discord in the Trojan tragedy.
When the mighty combined Greek armada and army were about to set off from Aulis, Greece to Troy to bring back Helen (which they finally succeeded after umpteen blood-soaked and blood-stained years) it was said that the beautiful Helen was 'the face that launched a thousand ships'.
 |
| Aulis was located somewhere between the letters 'I' and 'A' of the word BOEOTIA as depicted on above chart Today it's known as Avlida Troy or Ilium was to its north-east in today's Turkey |
This poetic immortal line might have come from Christopher Marlowe in his play Doctor Faustus (1592), where he wrote:
Was this the face that launch'd a thousand ships
And burnt the topless towers of Ilium?
Sweet Helen, make me immortal with a kiss.
Ilium is another name for Troy.
 |
| Christopher Marlowe |
Oh blast, I have wandered way off course in the post about slapping Ahmad Zahid wakakaka.
Let's examine just a few comments in Malaysiakini's 'Your Say':
Doc: What's the use of trying to slap some sense into Zahid? Zahid's statement that slapping DAP’s Seputeh MP Teresa Kok does not constitute a threat is not his first - nor will it be his last - idiotic statement.
We really need to identify if Zahid has a brain in between his two ears, or if it is just filled with kangkung to hold up his face.
Not Smart: Zahid, you are the only one who says that it is not a threat, but see for yourself how the public feels about the actions and words of the Muslim NGOs.
By you wanting to protect the NGOs and being selective in your actions, it looks like the slaps are now coming on to your face. The many rakyat’s same views on this matter cannot be wrong.
Even in a family, if a child says “I will slap you” to his/her siblings, the parents will intervene to stop such behaviour, to be fair and to protect the innocent.
We don't know much about your family's background and upbringing, but your actions, arrogance, and words do not reflect well of your character. Ask a child if such words from a stranger would be threatening and may be you can learn from the answer.
You are probably the worst, and the bottom of the 47 percent lot.
... and my choice of the lot, wakakaka:
 |
| I suppose some 'heroes' enjoy slapping women |
Sali Tambap: This is just playing into his hand. Slapping and punching people are things that he does; there is no need to stoop to his level. Stand on the moral high ground and let him expose himself for what he is.
Perhaps in his life and his philosophy, slapping a woman is the right thing to do.
Not surprising though - maybe he has been there, done that?
I kind of sympathise with the Home Minister.
There is so much serious crime in Malaysia - murders, rapes, gangland assassinations, prostitution, Bibles containing "Allah".
Some idiot offering money for more other idiots to slap some pipsqueak Opposition MP hardly merits diversion of police investigating resources. If nothing actually occurs, this goes into the "Not For Action" tray.
Ever heard of "triage" ?. Its an ugly but necessary word on the battlefield where the number of casualties overwhelms available medical resources. Doctors are forced to divide incoming casualties into 3 groups - hence "triage" -
First, those whose lives are in danger , but can be saved, and must be treated immediately.
Second, those who have less serious injuries, and can wait their turn to be treated.
Last are those who are too far gone to be saved, and are left to die.
![]()
Brabus, I have to rebut you on 3 points, as follows:
(1) triage is as what you have said, but is a threat to commit violence against Teresa Kok equivalent to the last of the medically injured? It's absolutely NOT as it's not about medical relief BUT about a criminal threat of VIOLENCE against a member of the public, let alone a Member of Parliament. And isn't prevention better than cure, namely, to investigate into that threat of violence and prevent possible physical harm to a people's representative?
(2) Previous Home Ministers had FAR MORE on their plate than this current clown such as the CT threat on both fronts of Malaysia, and the Triads in earlier days were far more insidious and deep-rooted in the mainly tho' not exclusively Chinese society (there were Indian and Malay gangsters as well) and far more pervasively widespread. So this clown can't even cope with the current scene with all the modern crime-prevention assets at his disposal? Then he best resigns from his post. But the truth is he's being not professional nor dedicated to his role as Home Minister, and rather be politicking to his own right wing 'constituency' by refusing to voice due concerns about the (pro-UMNO) threat against Teresa Kok.
(3) But by far worse than the two above, he has PUBLICLY and virtually said it's okay for thugs to threaten to commit violence against others, including a Member of Parliament. Where did he come from with such a mental outlook that belongs more to a kampung gangster, a barbaric hoodlum who believes in the law of the jungle. He is just plain LOW CLASS.
But you know, much as I have already expressed my low opinion of Zahid wakakaka, we still need to examine what sort of person this bloke is, and how a minister of HM the Yang Dipertuan Agong could ever bring himself to say such moronic shameful words, that a criminal threat of perpetuating violence on a woman, especially for reward, is not an issue important enough for police to look into, to at least prevent such a crime from occurring.
Let's go back a bit, specifically to 9 Nov 2010, when the then Minister of Defence, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi in predictable form as to be expected from the archetypal UMNO so-called patriots, stated in response to a question in Parliament on the low number of Chinese and Indian recruits in the military, that it could be due to the Chinese and Indians being ‘not patriotic enough’.
Perhaps in his life and his philosophy, slapping a woman is the right thing to do.
Not surprising though - maybe he has been there, done that?
wakakaka.
Meanwhile over at my post Slapping Stories, I received a comment in his defence by visitor Brabus, as follows (unedited):
I kind of sympathise with the Home Minister.
There is so much serious crime in Malaysia - murders, rapes, gangland assassinations, prostitution, Bibles containing "Allah".
Some idiot offering money for more other idiots to slap some pipsqueak Opposition MP hardly merits diversion of police investigating resources. If nothing actually occurs, this goes into the "Not For Action" tray.
Ever heard of "triage" ?. Its an ugly but necessary word on the battlefield where the number of casualties overwhelms available medical resources. Doctors are forced to divide incoming casualties into 3 groups - hence "triage" -
First, those whose lives are in danger , but can be saved, and must be treated immediately.
Second, those who have less serious injuries, and can wait their turn to be treated.
Last are those who are too far gone to be saved, and are left to die.
... and this has been my reply:
(1) triage is as what you have said, but is a threat to commit violence against Teresa Kok equivalent to the last of the medically injured? It's absolutely NOT as it's not about medical relief BUT about a criminal threat of VIOLENCE against a member of the public, let alone a Member of Parliament. And isn't prevention better than cure, namely, to investigate into that threat of violence and prevent possible physical harm to a people's representative?
(2) Previous Home Ministers had FAR MORE on their plate than this current clown such as the CT threat on both fronts of Malaysia, and the Triads in earlier days were far more insidious and deep-rooted in the mainly tho' not exclusively Chinese society (there were Indian and Malay gangsters as well) and far more pervasively widespread. So this clown can't even cope with the current scene with all the modern crime-prevention assets at his disposal? Then he best resigns from his post. But the truth is he's being not professional nor dedicated to his role as Home Minister, and rather be politicking to his own right wing 'constituency' by refusing to voice due concerns about the (pro-UMNO) threat against Teresa Kok.
(3) But by far worse than the two above, he has PUBLICLY and virtually said it's okay for thugs to threaten to commit violence against others, including a Member of Parliament. Where did he come from with such a mental outlook that belongs more to a kampung gangster, a barbaric hoodlum who believes in the law of the jungle. He is just plain LOW CLASS.
 |
| and you will also get a reward of RM1,200 from the Muslim Consumers Association of Malaysia (PPIM) |
But you know, much as I have already expressed my low opinion of Zahid wakakaka, we still need to examine what sort of person this bloke is, and how a minister of HM the Yang Dipertuan Agong could ever bring himself to say such moronic shameful words, that a criminal threat of perpetuating violence on a woman, especially for reward, is not an issue important enough for police to look into, to at least prevent such a crime from occurring.
Let's go back a bit, specifically to 9 Nov 2010, when the then Minister of Defence, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi in predictable form as to be expected from the archetypal UMNO so-called patriots, stated in response to a question in Parliament on the low number of Chinese and Indian recruits in the military, that it could be due to the Chinese and Indians being ‘not patriotic enough’.
I remember some retired Chinese and Indian senior officers including a couple of generals were reported by the press as calling him 'stupid'. He was, wasn't he? Wakakaka.
Who really is this so-called über patriot who had the brazen nerve or insensitivity to talk down on Chinese and Indians as being ‘not patriotic enough’ when he has never been a soldier or a policeman himself?
![]()
Well, maybe we can look at his personal values (or lack of) in, say, loyalty which would be directly linked to his so-called expertise on 'patriotism'! OK, we need to go back to 1998 then, wakakaka.
In 1998 Ahmad Zahid was a very close ally of Anwar Ibrahim and then the UMNO Youth Chief who accused his own party president Dr Mahathir Mohamad of corruption and cronyism.
Who really is this so-called über patriot who had the brazen nerve or insensitivity to talk down on Chinese and Indians as being ‘not patriotic enough’ when he has never been a soldier or a policeman himself?
Well, maybe we can look at his personal values (or lack of) in, say, loyalty which would be directly linked to his so-called expertise on 'patriotism'! OK, we need to go back to 1998 then, wakakaka.
In 1998 Ahmad Zahid was a very close ally of Anwar Ibrahim and then the UMNO Youth Chief who accused his own party president Dr Mahathir Mohamad of corruption and cronyism.
That unusual political biadap-ness to UMNO's icon and No 1 Man was seen as an alleged impatient move by the Anwar faction in UMNO to oust Mahathir out of his party and national positions into retirement so as to expedite Anwar’s final ascendancy to the party presidency and the PM’s post. With the advantage of hindsight that was an unwise and impatient move by Anwar Ibrahim and his faction.
For more, see my post The torment and impatience of Anwar Ibrahim.
![]()
In June 1998, The New York Times reported in its World Business page:
In what was seen as a jab at Mr. Mahathir's 17-year leadership, the head of UMNO' s youth wing, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, had called for an end to cronyism and nepotism during a speech to delegates.
"Why were big loans to big businessmen approved so easily when small guys had to wait so long to get a loan of 50,000 ringgit?" ($12,500) Mr. Ahmad Zahid asked.
The prime minister responded the next day by posting hundreds of names of people who have won government projects in recent years, a list which included his accuser, Mr. Ahmad Zahid.
Wakakaka.
Well, on feeling the full impact of the wrathful vengeance of an angry Dr Mahathir, he abandoned his so-called loyal allegiance to Anwar like a rat scurrying from a sinking ship wakakaka, to embrace his new ‘father’ Dr Mahathir, wakakaka.
Yes, Zahid's superior survival skills wakakaka had him confessing that Anwar was the bloke who instructed him to attack Dr Mahathir on allegations of cronyism and nepotism. Okay, but what about his own crony benefits as exposed by the Grand Olde Man, wakakaka?
Oh, that fabled UMNO-Malay loyalty ... wakakaka.
Now, why have I described Dr Mahathir as his new ‘father’ wakakaka ...
… because in his repentant bodek-ing of Dr Mahathir wakakaka and of course simultaneous betrayal of Anwar, he finished his confessional with a flamboyant flourish by apologizing to Dr Mahathir, acknowledging the UMNO President’s rebuke of him as a father-to-son advice wakakaka - for more read the New Straits Times of 19 June 1999.
Hmmm, perhaps that could explain why Dr M has never forgive Anwar but had since tolerated Zahid, wakakaka.
Who knows, with his seeming natural ease in treachery and betrayal, Zahid Hamidi might well be PM one day wakakaka. Now I say this ONLY because some of my visitors have kept chiding me on my naivety about realpolitik, and not to be so insistent on purity of political purpose but rather to adopt a mamanlai practicality. And hasn't Zahid been more manmanlai than Mr Manmanlai himself, wakakaka!
But anyway, given Zahid’s double treachery, firstly against Dr Mahathir, and then against his mentor-patron Anwar Ibrahim, had he really been qualified to talk on patriotism in his reply to a question in Parliament on the low number of Chinese and Indian recruits in the military?
And this had been from a man who had never served a single day as a soldier or policeman, unlike thousands of Indians and Chinese. His only combat experience had been a mighty political cuff on his ears from his subsequently-acknowledged ‘father’, wakakaka.
Now, am not sure whether Dr Mahathir was angry with him because of his treachery or because Zahid as an UMNO Melayu had failed pathetically in his infamous Pearl Harbour-like strike against him, and a Melayu (especially one from UMNO) failing has been one thing Dr Mahathir couldn't stand, even more than mere betrayal against him, wakakaka!
To reiterate, he was utterly shamelessly treacherous to both Dr Mahathir and Anwar Ibrahim. Najib would do bloody well to keep a steady beady eye on this man, wakakaka.
In my post about Chinese policemen and also in my letter to Malaysiakini titled Chinese M'sians, too, have died for one Malaysia I wonder where were these Zahid-like UMNO and pro-UMNO patriots when Chinese Malaysian policemen and military personnel fought, with some dying, for their country?
As Aldous Huxley informed us of the Zahid’s brand of patriotism: “One of the great attractions of patriotism - it fulfills our worst wishes. In the person of our nation we are able, vicariously, to bully and cheat. Bully and cheat, what’s more, with a feeling that we are profoundly virtuous.”
But you know, the most, yes, the most sad thing that I read, with regards to my letter to Malaysiakini titled Chinese M'sians, too, have died for one Malaysia in response to Pak Kadir Yasin's sarcastic remarks in regards to the Lahad Datu incursion and the tragic killing of our policemen that “perhaps there is wisdom in getting more Chinese and Indians to join the armed forces so that they too can die for one Malaysia”, was not about Pak Kadir's opinions, but that of a Chinese - no, not Ridhuan Tee.
I had written that letter to remind Pak Kadir of our brave but now-unrecognized non-Malay policemen and military personnel who made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty a la tanah tumpatnya darahku.
In my Malaysiakini letter I had stated: All right then, who’s to be blamed for the Malays bearing all the greatest sacrifice to their nation? Surely not the Chinese for in 'less divisive' days, we depended heavily (though not solely) on mainly Chinese policemen (and women) in the Special Branch to win our war against the insurrection of the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM), as well as included names and operational details of those killed.
Also see my article for the Centre for Public Initiatives (CPI) titled I wish to remain a Malaysian - KTemoc replies Kadir Jasin though this was about a much earlier episode (by 3 years) to the Lahad Datu incursion.
I was shocked and very much dismayed by a comment by Miss Muppet which was drawn to my attention by a blogger friend. Her abysmal and unbelievable utterance was, words to the effect as far as I can remember them, my narrative of Chinese policemen spilling their blood for their country 'was hardly a reality of today’s situation'.
I normally don’t like to comment on her or her anti DAP blogging because of our past friendship. But much as I think I know her and her character and hang-ups, or so I thought, I was still very much shocked by her very ungracious and callous comment.
I had then felt very sad about the vile pit of political viciousness she has irreparably fallen into since her political belakang pusing. And don't ask me why she has done so because I would never ever reveal the story, for I like to respect my own worth and the honour of confidentiality that I pride myself in keeping.
Yup, I had kept quiet about her callous remark for a long long time but perhaps now is the time to share it with you, to show that Zahid can’t hold a candle to her degree of betrayal.
In that most ungracious and hurtful comment on an undeniable fact, that of Chinese policemen being killed in their line of duty for their nation, with some posthumously awarded our nation's highest gallantry award, the Seri Pahlawan Gagah Perkasa (SP), and also of those who survived and were also awarded the SP, what was she trying to achieve, other than to diminish and belittle the sacrifices of those brave policemen - can you think of a better reason?
In her callous and insensitive dismissal of the ultimate contributions of Chinese policemen and soldiers as being hardly a reflection of today's reality, she was unbelievable, and unbelievably cruel to the families of those real patriots, and sadly, damaging her own worth for the grave and unforgivable betrayal of her own ethnicity.
And for what,汉奸?
As Emily Brontë had written in Wuthering Heights:
![]()
“You teach me now how cruel you've been - cruel and false. Why did you despise me? Why did you betray your own heart,Cathy? I have not one word of comfort. You deserve this. You have killed yourself. Yes, you may kiss me, and cry; and wring out my kisses and tears: they'll blight you - they'll damn you. …..”
Especially of those Chinese policemen and soldiers who had already spilled their red blood and bleached their bones white in their duties to their country, I was stunned that she had dared to comment so callously of those sacrifices as hardly a reality of today’s situation?
Weren't those policemen and soldiers REAL? Were their blood, toil, tears and sweat REAL? Aren't their surviving children and/or descendants a REALITY of today's Malaysia?
Must Chinese continue spilling their blood to satisfy her perverted Bathory-ish blood lust and her hatred of all things Chinese?
Besides, was she not aware from my letter that it had been written also in part as a response to Zahid’s parliamentary reply on the Defence Ministry’s low recruitment of non-Malays?
Now, that's the REALITY of today's situation when it has been the Defence Ministry’s low recruitment of non-Malays that has resulted in the small numbers of Chinese or Indians in the military today - perhaps less acute in the police - and which those UMNO so-called patriots should take note of.
In earlier years, there had been a tradition and known/recorded history of many Chinese and Indians joining the armed forces and police, even as infantry soldier and ordinary mata-mata, like many members of my own family ….. so f**k those government's lousy bull of an excuse that Chinese won't join the police or armed forces because they only want high salaried jobs.
Okay, I have vented my hurt at her words (I have family members in the police and military and one of them was killed by CTs while on active duty, while my uncles had more than one friend who were similarly killed) so let's return to our dear Zahid.
Since then, we have also heard Zahid telling citizens who raised relevant issues of importance to the state and society to virtually f**k off from Malaysia - for more, see Din Merican's Sheer arrogance - new Home Minister tells unhappy Malaysians to emigrate.
So, did you really expect such a whatever-you-wish-to call-him to consider a threat to slap a woman a criminal act, more so when the criminal act has been perpetuated by a pro-UMNO group?
![]()
For more, see my post The torment and impatience of Anwar Ibrahim.
In June 1998, The New York Times reported in its World Business page:
In what was seen as a jab at Mr. Mahathir's 17-year leadership, the head of UMNO' s youth wing, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, had called for an end to cronyism and nepotism during a speech to delegates.
"Why were big loans to big businessmen approved so easily when small guys had to wait so long to get a loan of 50,000 ringgit?" ($12,500) Mr. Ahmad Zahid asked.
The prime minister responded the next day by posting hundreds of names of people who have won government projects in recent years, a list which included his accuser, Mr. Ahmad Zahid.
Wakakaka.
Well, on feeling the full impact of the wrathful vengeance of an angry Dr Mahathir, he abandoned his so-called loyal allegiance to Anwar like a rat scurrying from a sinking ship wakakaka, to embrace his new ‘father’ Dr Mahathir, wakakaka.
 |
| Bung Anwar, good luck to your presidential ambitions (hey, I'm Javanese and we Javanese always say Bung as in Bung 'Karno) but 'cuse me lah, I have to go ashore to board the train before it leaves, Eh, what train? The gravy train lah of course! wakakaka |
Yes, Zahid's superior survival skills wakakaka had him confessing that Anwar was the bloke who instructed him to attack Dr Mahathir on allegations of cronyism and nepotism. Okay, but what about his own crony benefits as exposed by the Grand Olde Man, wakakaka?
Oh, that fabled UMNO-Malay loyalty ... wakakaka.
 |
| Oh Ayah, no no bukan saya. It's Anwar lah! |
Now, why have I described Dr Mahathir as his new ‘father’ wakakaka ...
… because in his repentant bodek-ing of Dr Mahathir wakakaka and of course simultaneous betrayal of Anwar, he finished his confessional with a flamboyant flourish by apologizing to Dr Mahathir, acknowledging the UMNO President’s rebuke of him as a father-to-son advice wakakaka - for more read the New Straits Times of 19 June 1999.
Hmmm, perhaps that could explain why Dr M has never forgive Anwar but had since tolerated Zahid, wakakaka.
Who knows, with his seeming natural ease in treachery and betrayal, Zahid Hamidi might well be PM one day wakakaka. Now I say this ONLY because some of my visitors have kept chiding me on my naivety about realpolitik, and not to be so insistent on purity of political purpose but rather to adopt a mamanlai practicality. And hasn't Zahid been more manmanlai than Mr Manmanlai himself, wakakaka!
But anyway, given Zahid’s double treachery, firstly against Dr Mahathir, and then against his mentor-patron Anwar Ibrahim, had he really been qualified to talk on patriotism in his reply to a question in Parliament on the low number of Chinese and Indian recruits in the military?
And this had been from a man who had never served a single day as a soldier or policeman, unlike thousands of Indians and Chinese. His only combat experience had been a mighty political cuff on his ears from his subsequently-acknowledged ‘father’, wakakaka.
Now, am not sure whether Dr Mahathir was angry with him because of his treachery or because Zahid as an UMNO Melayu had failed pathetically in his infamous Pearl Harbour-like strike against him, and a Melayu (especially one from UMNO) failing has been one thing Dr Mahathir couldn't stand, even more than mere betrayal against him, wakakaka!
To reiterate, he was utterly shamelessly treacherous to both Dr Mahathir and Anwar Ibrahim. Najib would do bloody well to keep a steady beady eye on this man, wakakaka.
In my post about Chinese policemen and also in my letter to Malaysiakini titled Chinese M'sians, too, have died for one Malaysia I wonder where were these Zahid-like UMNO and pro-UMNO patriots when Chinese Malaysian policemen and military personnel fought, with some dying, for their country?
 |
| Aldous Huxley |
As Aldous Huxley informed us of the Zahid’s brand of patriotism: “One of the great attractions of patriotism - it fulfills our worst wishes. In the person of our nation we are able, vicariously, to bully and cheat. Bully and cheat, what’s more, with a feeling that we are profoundly virtuous.”
But you know, the most, yes, the most sad thing that I read, with regards to my letter to Malaysiakini titled Chinese M'sians, too, have died for one Malaysia in response to Pak Kadir Yasin's sarcastic remarks in regards to the Lahad Datu incursion and the tragic killing of our policemen that “perhaps there is wisdom in getting more Chinese and Indians to join the armed forces so that they too can die for one Malaysia”, was not about Pak Kadir's opinions, but that of a Chinese - no, not Ridhuan Tee.
I had written that letter to remind Pak Kadir of our brave but now-unrecognized non-Malay policemen and military personnel who made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty a la tanah tumpatnya darahku.
In my Malaysiakini letter I had stated: All right then, who’s to be blamed for the Malays bearing all the greatest sacrifice to their nation? Surely not the Chinese for in 'less divisive' days, we depended heavily (though not solely) on mainly Chinese policemen (and women) in the Special Branch to win our war against the insurrection of the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM), as well as included names and operational details of those killed.
Also see my article for the Centre for Public Initiatives (CPI) titled I wish to remain a Malaysian - KTemoc replies Kadir Jasin though this was about a much earlier episode (by 3 years) to the Lahad Datu incursion.
.jpg) |
| police in action at Lahad Datu |
I was shocked and very much dismayed by a comment by Miss Muppet which was drawn to my attention by a blogger friend. Her abysmal and unbelievable utterance was, words to the effect as far as I can remember them, my narrative of Chinese policemen spilling their blood for their country 'was hardly a reality of today’s situation'.
I normally don’t like to comment on her or her anti DAP blogging because of our past friendship. But much as I think I know her and her character and hang-ups, or so I thought, I was still very much shocked by her very ungracious and callous comment.
I had then felt very sad about the vile pit of political viciousness she has irreparably fallen into since her political belakang pusing. And don't ask me why she has done so because I would never ever reveal the story, for I like to respect my own worth and the honour of confidentiality that I pride myself in keeping.
Yup, I had kept quiet about her callous remark for a long long time but perhaps now is the time to share it with you, to show that Zahid can’t hold a candle to her degree of betrayal.
In that most ungracious and hurtful comment on an undeniable fact, that of Chinese policemen being killed in their line of duty for their nation, with some posthumously awarded our nation's highest gallantry award, the Seri Pahlawan Gagah Perkasa (SP), and also of those who survived and were also awarded the SP, what was she trying to achieve, other than to diminish and belittle the sacrifices of those brave policemen - can you think of a better reason?
 |
| Seri Pahlawan Gagah Perksasa |
In her callous and insensitive dismissal of the ultimate contributions of Chinese policemen and soldiers as being hardly a reflection of today's reality, she was unbelievable, and unbelievably cruel to the families of those real patriots, and sadly, damaging her own worth for the grave and unforgivable betrayal of her own ethnicity.
And for what,汉奸?
As Emily Brontë had written in Wuthering Heights:
“You teach me now how cruel you've been - cruel and false. Why did you despise me? Why did you betray your own heart,
Especially of those Chinese policemen and soldiers who had already spilled their red blood and bleached their bones white in their duties to their country, I was stunned that she had dared to comment so callously of those sacrifices as hardly a reality of today’s situation?
Weren't those policemen and soldiers REAL? Were their blood, toil, tears and sweat REAL? Aren't their surviving children and/or descendants a REALITY of today's Malaysia?
Must Chinese continue spilling their blood to satisfy her perverted Bathory-ish blood lust and her hatred of all things Chinese?
Besides, was she not aware from my letter that it had been written also in part as a response to Zahid’s parliamentary reply on the Defence Ministry’s low recruitment of non-Malays?
Now, that's the REALITY of today's situation when it has been the Defence Ministry’s low recruitment of non-Malays that has resulted in the small numbers of Chinese or Indians in the military today - perhaps less acute in the police - and which those UMNO so-called patriots should take note of.
In earlier years, there had been a tradition and known/recorded history of many Chinese and Indians joining the armed forces and police, even as infantry soldier and ordinary mata-mata, like many members of my own family ….. so f**k those government's lousy bull of an excuse that Chinese won't join the police or armed forces because they only want high salaried jobs.
Okay, I have vented my hurt at her words (I have family members in the police and military and one of them was killed by CTs while on active duty, while my uncles had more than one friend who were similarly killed) so let's return to our dear Zahid.
 |
| CTs |
Since then, we have also heard Zahid telling citizens who raised relevant issues of importance to the state and society to virtually f**k off from Malaysia - for more, see Din Merican's Sheer arrogance - new Home Minister tells unhappy Malaysians to emigrate.
So, did you really expect such a whatever-you-wish-to call-him to consider a threat to slap a woman a criminal act, more so when the criminal act has been perpetuated by a pro-UMNO group?
But you know, angry, sad and hurt as I had been earlier, in the end I still can't get over the Malaysiakini headline so cleverly provided by MKINI reader Louis, namely, Zahid, the face that launched a thousand slaps, wakakaka,
... with even more wakakaka's as I see the the thousand slaps, ships and sellouts connection between Zahid and Helen ... er ... of Troy of course, wakakaka.
![]()
